Gross asserted the only remedy which will correct these violations, would be for Extraordinary Writ Jurisdiction under the All Writs Act pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1651, to be granted and that Writs of Supervisory and Prohibition be issued under the direct control of the U.S. Supreme Court.   The defendants in this cause, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division, Texas Board of Pardon and Parole, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Executive Board and the Texas Attorney General deny all these claims.   The Court has not ruled on the merits for Leave to file stated issue herein. The Court has not ruled on any argument or defense by the defendants.   Legal matters have arisen during the preparation of this case that could affect your right as a prisoner in Texas and good-time/work-time credits toward your sentence/parole benefits that are being denied to you.   Persons who either wish to be a party to this suit as a (Member) may file Intervention Motions pursuant to U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedures Rule (23), or sign the attached Member Form application which will be presented to the federal court on your behalf.   Persons who wish to abstain from this suit need do nothing, as any adverse decision will not subject you to conditions you are not presently experiencing.   The purpose of this notice is to advise you of these events and the potential effect on your rights.   If you wish to be identified as a Class Member of this suit and on whose behalf this suit is being maintained, you should fully understand all rights before making your decision.   We have attached the essential Signature Form for you to sign. This will be presented to the U.S. Federal Court on your behalf. When the initial ruling is pronounced, the Clerk of Court will contact you with further details concerning your rights and privileges in the ongoing litigation being maintained in the behalf of Texas prisoners against the defendants listed herein. Confidentiality and Acknowledgment   To expedite the flow of discovery materials, facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality, protect inmates from retaliation and material entitlements, this will be kept confidential, and insure that protection is afforded inmates and their materials, pursuant to authority under the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedures Rule 26.   Confidential testimony and documents will be stamped as "Confidential Documents" under Order in Civil Action, United States District Court, to signify that it contains information believed to be subject to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 26.   Notwithstanding paragraph 1, inmates who are actively engaged in this litigation will be subject to the protection and rights of the Court.   Persons notified for depositions or designated as trial witnesses to the extent reasonably necessary in preparing for evidence, will be subject to confidential status, as its protections are deemed necessary.   Plaintiffs will file by January 15th, 2004, their claims as directed by the Clerk of Court for seeking class certification, identifying the class for which certification is sought, detailing the facts on which satisfaction of the requirements of Fed.R.Cv.P. Rule 23 is asserted, and describing what and how notices will be given to class member inmates.   All testimony claim issues, requests and responses are subject to the requirements of Fed.R.Cv.P. Rule 26(b)(1)(2) and (g). Testimony or claims shall not, without prior approval of the Court, be taken of persons not identified within the present claim.   Counsel that will be appointed shall to the extent possible, combine their interrogatories to all members unit by unit. No answers or claims will be presented that has already been filed within this claim.   Without leave of this Court, interrogatories shall not include more than three (3) separate questions or claims. Case Management Order   The persons and their claims whose name is affixed herein are until further notice, consolidated for pending certification based upon the issues raised by the administrator Raymond Gross. This order does not constitute a determination that these claims should be restricted or determined for trial, nor does it have the effect of making any party or entity a party to an action in which it has been joined and served in accordance with the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedures. Claims existing in separate Courts   Any case pending in U.S. District Courts, motions, pleadings and any other documents will bear the caption similar to that of this case. All future documents and claims shall include in their caption the notation that they relate to "ALL CASES" and will be filed and docketed only in the Master file of this case.   The actions listed herein are not consolidated for pretrial purposes at the present time. Motion for Leave is pending in the U.S. Supreme Court Raymond Fredrick Gross Vs. Texas Board of Pardon and Parole. However discovery of interested persons in becoming class members shall be coordinated on a unit-by-unit basis. With that, all members' claims will be consolidated to prevent duplication and conflicts.   The Clerk of Court will facilitate all filings of perspective class members and will file stated forms both in the master file and the specified individual case files. Organization of Administrator and Maintainer PLAINTIFF:Raymond F. Gross Ellis Unit Huntsville, Texas. [Future administrators to be listed here] DEFENDANTS:    Texas Dept. Criminal Justice Inst.Division Texas Dept. Crim. Justice Executive Board Texas Board of Pardon and Parole Texas Attorney General COUNSEL:    Counsel who anticipate seeking appointment Shall comply with directives contained in the Class Action infra section of 41.32 Acknowledgment of Class Action Agreement   All persons whose signature is affixed herein state under penalty of perjury that they reside in the State of Texas, County of _______.   That s/he has read and fully understand the directives listed herein and agree to the litigation of stated claims.   That s/he is not engaged in contrary litigation of same issues stated herein. If involved with collateral issues, permission is granted to consolidate and said litigation under the Transfer Order in said case. In re: Gross Vs. Texas   That s/he will not divulge to persons other than those specifically authorized by the Court as administrator, Clerk of Court Counsel or Judge, of any information or orders, and will not copy or use, except solely for purposes of this litigation, and confidential documents, testimony or trial strategy as defined by any protective orders issued by the Court.   That s/he will not disclose any information to any person or counsel unless actively involved in the conduct of the litigation in the behalf of Texas Prisoners vs. Texas Board of Pardon and Parole.     That s/he understands that if appearing that submission of claims of privilege to a special master appointed under U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedures Rule 53 is warranted by the expected volume of such claims and by the likelihood that in camera inspection may be needed to rule on these claims and should be accomplished, to the extent possible, by someone other than the Judge to whom this litigation may be assigned, the Administrator has authority to act on your behalf with consent of the Court.   That s/he hereby agrees to all stated herein by the accompanying signature form.   That s/he is confident in this case litigations administrator and the claims he has raised unless other wise stated in said signature form.   That the administrator has not coerced or implied any guarantees as to the outcome of this litigation and has not requested any monetary assistance.